Thursday, May 14, 2026

LARGER MODULAR FROM JEFFERSON SCHOOL COULD BE USED AT PRESCOTT SCHOOL

 This document was sent to Missoula County Public Schools officials(listed below). Using a bigger modular such as the one at Jefferson School(which was built at Rattlesnake School in 2012) would be a solution if the district maintains it's position that Prescott School is too small. This doesn't make sense since it has been a school since 1951and has been used for many different grade levels. 


LARGER MODULAR FROM JEFFERSON SCHOOL COULD BE USED AT PRESCOTT SCHOOL

To: Missoula County Public Schools officials, Superintendent Micah Hill, Maintenance Director Burley McWilliams, Missoula County Public Schools Board of Trustees and Missoula citizens

This email is regarding using modulars in Rattlesnake, specifically Prescott School. Modulars have been used in the Rattlesnake for years (see history below).

The reason why a modular is being brought up currently as it relates to Prescott School is that the district has included Prescott School on a list of vacant properties and is making decisions on each one. 

Recently, we have heard the Missoula County Public Schools district say that the size, or “footprint”, of Prescott School is too small and this would be one reason why the district would not want to keep Prescott.

This reasoning does not make sense since Prescott School has been a public school for 135 years (outside of the inappropriate lease to Missoula International School for about 20 years beginning in 2004). Prescott School has been used for a variety of different grade levels during these years with different levels of enrollment. A look at the history of Prescott School published in a booklet by MCPS tells us this.

Moreover, an economist has told the district that MCPS needs to build flexibility into its schools. Keeping Prescott School, even if it is a smaller school than many district schools, would enhance flexibility in the Rattlesnake Valley as so many of our children are at this time, and in the past, being bused out of the Rattlesnake.

 A modular can be used when enrollment at a school has increased, and more classroom space is needed instead of busing our students as mentioned. As a counter to the district selling or using Prescott School for something else other than a school, due to its size, there is an alternative - that of a newer modular being brought to the Prescott School site. There are two newer modulars at Jefferson School.

There is currently an older smaller modular on the north side of Prescott School. This modular, I am told by a teacher, was brought over from Hawthorne School many years ago. Unfortunately, with the lease of Prescott School to Missoula International School this modular, although it could be used for space, would need some clean up and repairs due to neglect by MIS.

A modular would be beneficial not only for Prescott but for the district if it continues the narrative that Prescott is too small. It would also be better than building an addition to the Prescott School building or any other building or a sale.

Recently, we went to the north side of Prescott School and did some measurements.

We measured the area around the older modular to see if a bigger modular could fit, if the older modular was moved or if another modular could fit in front of it. Yes, it could.

Measurements of the modular at Prescott School

Measurements of the modular itself 24’x40’ (24’ wide and 40’ long)

12’ from the stairs of the modular to the building (this leaves room between a modular and the building-which may be enough or more than enough to bring in a larger modular.

24’ from the modular to the telephone poll.

____________________________________________________________________________________

Measurements of the modular at Jefferson School

Measurements of the modular itself 44’x53’ (44’wide and 53’long)

9’ stair measurement that is attached to the front of the modular at Jefferson- which is situated on the length side of the modular

____________________________________________________________________________________

Notes

The difference in width is 20’ (44’for the Jefferson modular and 24’ for the Prescott modular)

The difference in length is 13’ (53’ for the newer modular at Jefferson and 40’ for the Prescott modular)

***At Prescott School there is room for additional length for the newer Jefferson modular with the 13’ difference.

***There is also room for the newer Jefferson modular when considering the width. There would be 6’ of space between the modular and a pole that is near Briar Street. One could add 2’ or more feet of space in this area if you allowed 10’ between the school building and the modular instead of the 12’ of space which it is currently. You could add some footage also because the stairs are in different positions.

 

Figure 1 Modular at Jefferson School - 1 of 1 2026

 


                                                                               

Figure 2 Modular at Jefferson School – 1 of 2 - 2026

Figure 3 Jefferson School – triplet to Prescott and Washington Schools

Modular at Prescott School – 2026

Figure 4 Prescott School modular looking north – 2026

 

Figure 5 Prescott School Modular looking east – 2026

Figure 6 Modular at Prescott School looking southeast - 2026

Some modular history

In 2004, after the closure of Rattlesnake Middle School, Prescott School, and Mt. Jumbo School, the modular which was at Rattlesnake Middle School was moved to Washington Middle School which entailed multiple hook-ups to the school.

 After the 2004 closures, Rattlesnake Middle School was converted to an elementary school.  Later, when the population of the newly created Rattlesnake Elementary School grew, MCPS district approved the building of another modular(!), a two-room modular at Rattlesnake Elementary and also another one at Lowell School. (This approval was immediately after the MCPS district approved an extension of the lease of Prescott School to Missoula International School, which shows inappropriate loyalty to MIS and malfeasance in the handling of district properties, especially to Prescott School.)

 

Further information about the Rattlesnake modular -

The information below is from a May 2012 MCPS meeting discussing and awarding the building of two modulars, one for Lowell and one for Rattlesnake Middle School. Elementary School. It you divide $417,147 in half the bid for one modular is $208, 573. Adding the prep work and landscaping most likely would have cost about $250,000 or more.

The May 2012 minutes are below. This information was on another blog created after the 2004 closures. (www.missoulaschoolwatchdog.blogspot.com) There are 10 posts just on the modulars on this blog!

6. Topic: Award Modular Classroom Bid

– Lowell & Rattlesnake Schools

(Elem) (Action)

Background Information:

At April 10th, Board meeting, Trustees granted

permission to solicit bids for the construction of modulars located at Lowell and

Rattlesnake schools. The District received four responses to the bid.

The bids were opened on May 8

th, and the results are as follows:


Vendor Bid Amount

Sirius Construction $417,147


MKC $432,836

Western Interstate $449,000


Lower Construction $467,062

Administrative Recommendation:

Administration recommends that Trustees


award the Rattlesnake and Lowell modular bid to Sirius Construction. at the June

12, 2012 regular Board meeting on the Consent Agenda.

In 2015, a bond of $151 million was passed by the voters. The bond funded Rattlesnake Elementary Middle School four additional classrooms and an entryway renovation. The modulars that were built in 2012 were moved! So…not only did the district move the modular from what was then the Rattlesnake Middle School turned into the elementary school in 2004, but they also moved the newer modular that was built in 2012 due to the bond recommendations.

The district has spent thousands of dollars and perhaps up to a million on modulars and the moving of the modulars bringing home the point that just keeping Prescott School open would have saved the district money.

The modular at Rattlesnake Elementary School and the Lowell modular were moved to the back of Jefferson School. (I believe this to be the case.)

In conclusion, rather than close Prescott School permanently, the district could use the modular at Jefferson. It appears that that modular is meant to be in the Rattlesnake Valley, this time at Prescott School, if it is needed. 

Thank you for reading this information. We must reopen Prescott School for the children, families, neighborhood, teachers, and even the district.

Thank you again!

Jeanne Joscelyn

jeannejoscelyn@hotmail.com

www.prescottschoolmissoula.blogspot.com

Facebook – Save Prescott School

New! YouTube – Prescott School in Missoula

(These things aren’t perfect but have information about Prescott School.)

 

 

 

 


The Rattlesnake residents do not deserve to lose another one of our historic, needed, popular, and valuable neighborhood schools, Prescott School. Unfortunately, we lost Lincoln School, a charming, historic, beautiful, and popular school for the Rattlesnake residents and all Missoulians. We must stop the sale of Prescott School. We need to keep Prescott School in the school district for the use of Missoula County Public Schools children for which it was built. 


 LINCOLN SCHOOL FOR SALE SIGN


  • DO NOT WANT A FOR SALE SIGN ON PRESCOTT SCHOOL! 

Wednesday, May 6, 2026

June 17th, 2024 email to MCPS Maintenance Director Burley McWilliams regarding the sprinkler issues for the playground at Prescott School

This post highlights an email written on June 17, 2024, to MCPS maintenance director, Burley McWilliams and the Superintendent regarding the maintenance of Prescott School mainly on the outside of the building. Our family had been working on the landscaping for about a year at this point. In this letter we are asking for information on the sprinkler system on the playground. 

The previous renters, Missoula International School, did not take care of the premises, both inside and out. 

Poor maintenance is the key problem at this time and has always been since 2004, the year that Prescott School was first leased to MIS, but especially now as the district is not seeing the value of Prescott School as an assset to the district, which does not make sense for many reasons.

Thank you for reading this email which was sent to: 

Burley McWilliams, Micah Hill, and public comment, 


Hello Burley!

Thank you very much for arranging the painting at Prescott School! The south side of the school looks so much better! The peeling paint was quite a blight. One neighbor told me that she was very happy about the upgrade and I’m sure there are many more happy neighbors!

We also appreciated the painting over of the graffiti on the north side of the building!

With the better weather our family has been working on the front of the grounds with mowing, weed eating, and planting flowers in the planter box.  Additionally, a volunteer has been doing great work weed eating the area by the swings and the bushes around the play area. She has been a big help. And I think  others will join her as the summer progresses.

We also are glad that the district mowed the playground about a week ago (maybe this was Brandon who I met last summer who was such a help picking  up the lawn bags!). With all the rain and the mowing, the area is looking better than it has for a long time!

We were wondering if you had some ideas on what could be next for the summer maintenance or perhaps even some inside maintenance.

We understand that you are short on help, however, there are things that need to be done that may not be too expensive.

One idea we and some neighbors had was to continue working on the area where a sprinkler system was installed last summer. Is the contractor responsible for the sprinkler installation finished with his end of the project? Or maybe the district employees were doing this project? The filling of the trenches and the leveling of the soil need to be done as people could be hurt walking and running on the grounds, perhaps twisting an ankle, etc. With the sprinkler system completed children could safely play sports and other activities on the field. We would be happy to help with this work, along with others, I’m sure.  

With the weather cooperating (hopefully!) I think there will be more volunteer help.

Is there any way we can get access to the outside front faucet for watering the flowers that we planted. Last year we hauled water, however, using a faucet would be a lot easier. We would really like a faucet turnkey handle and would use it responsibly. Perhaps Brandon could help us with this?

Also, we recently purchased a power washer for use on our property. And we would really like to use it to clean off the asphalt around the Prescott School building. We could also use the pressure washer to spray off the bricks on the bottom of the building walls which have mold growing on them. We will need access, i.e. a turnkey handle, to a faucet for these chores, also.

With our, other citizens, and your ideas we could get Prescott School back to the well-maintained school it once was prior to the lease to a private school, which, unfortunately, did not take good care of the building or grounds. And then hopefully discussions of reopening the school can take place😊.

Thank you again for help.

Jeanne Joscelyn, 1335 Clarkia, Missoula, MT 59802 jeannejoscelyn@hotmail.com 406-303-0703 cell