Sunday, August 9, 2026

PART #2 "FULL INVESTIGATIVE REPORT ON THE CLOSURE AND LEASE OF PRESCOTT SCHOOL"

This post continues the last part of the report,  "FULL INVESTIGATIVE REPORT ON THE CLOSURE AND LEASE OF PRESCOTT SCHOOL". It includes Sections 5 through 8 of the report.

SECTION 5 — MIS Representatives and Organizational Actions

5.1 Overview

MIS representatives played an active role in securing Prescott School.

Julie Lennox — MIS Head of School

  • Signed multiple lease extensions

  • Regularly attended MCPS meetings

  • Advocated for long‑term occupancy

Martha Newell — Former MIS Officer

  • Served on MIS Board with Rehbein

  • Lived near Prescott

  • Did not publicly support Prescott as a public school

MIS Organizational Actions

2004 Letter Requesting Prescott

MIS formally requested Prescott School before the second closure vote.

2005–2011 Letters

MIS repeatedly requested:

  • Lease extensions

  • Renovation permissions

  • Long‑term stability

  • Consideration for purchase

The 2011 letter emphasized the need for a five‑year facility to meet IBO accreditation requirements.

MIS Renovations

MIS made significant changes to Prescott’s playground and interior, some of which were inappropriate for a historic public building.

MIS’s Long‑Term Goal

MIS consistently sought to purchase Prescott School.

SECTION 6 — Financial Impacts, Lease Rates, and Ignored Warnings

6.1 Overview

The Prescott lease resulted in substantial financial losses for MCPS.

6.2 Lease Rates

  • Roosevelt School: $1.75/sq ft

  • Mount Jumbo School: $2.25/sq ft

  • Prescott School (MIS): $0.79/sq ft

MIS received a dramatically reduced rate.

6.3 Math Professor’s Warning

A University of Montana math professor warned:

“If the International School attracts even five additional students… the rental loses more than it gains.”

He warned losses could reach hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Trustees ignored this warning.

6.4 Estimated Losses

The professor later estimated MCPS lost approximately $500,000 in one year due to the lease.

MIS grew to 200 students, likely resulting in millions in losses over time.

6.5 Trustees Ignored Financial Red Flags

Trustees supporting the lease:

  • Ignored enrollment impacts

  • Ignored transportation costs

  • Ignored long‑term financial consequences

  • Approved lease extensions

6.6 Additional Financial Considerations

  • Increased busing costs

  • Loss of neighborhood school value

  • Complications from MIS renovations

  • Pressure for long‑term lease extensions

SECTION 7 — Community Impacts and Additional Considerations

7.1 Overview

The closure of Prescott had profound community impacts.

7.2 Impact on the Rattlesnake Community

Loss of a Neighborhood School

Prescott served the valley for 135 years. Its closure disrupted:

  • Walkability

  • Community identity

  • Family routines

Student Displacement

Approximately 600 middle school students were bused to other schools.

7.3 Impact on MCPS Operations

Transportation Costs

Costs were higher than stated.

Enrollment Losses

MIS’s growth reduced MCPS funding.

Property Management Challenges

MIS’s renovations complicated MCPS’s long‑term planning.

7.4 Community Conversations

Community members reported:

  • Inconsistent closure rationales

  • Predictions of closures that later proved true

  • Trustees under pressure

7.5 Broader Considerations

Neighborhood schools provide stability and community cohesion. Leasing public schools to private institutions creates long‑term risks.

SECTION 8 — Conclusion and Final Analysis

8.1 Overview

The closure and lease of Prescott School were the result of years of coordinated actions, shifting votes, and decisions that aligned with MIS’s expansion goals.

8.2 Key Findings

  • Repeated closure attempts

  • Alignment with MIS’s timeline

  • Conflicts of interest

  • Ignored financial warnings

  • Sweetheart lease rates

  • Long‑term community harm

8.3 Broader Implications

The Prescott case illustrates the risks of private influence on public school governance and underscores the need for ethical, transparent decision‑making.

8.4 Final Analysis

The closure of Prescott School was not inevitable. It resulted from:

  • Strategic timing

  • Undisclosed affiliations

  • Preferential treatment

  • Ignored warnings

  • Lack of transparency

The consequences were profound:

  • A neighborhood school lost

  • A community disrupted

  • A district financially harmed

8.5 Closing Statement

Prescott School served the Rattlesnake Valley for more than a century. Its closure and lease to a private institution were decisions that should never have been made without full transparency, ethical governance, and careful financial analysis.

The community deserved better.

This report stands as a record of what happened, why it happened, and how similar outcomes can be prevented in the future.


No comments:

Post a Comment